|
Go to Representative Consumer Protection Cases (Alphabetized by Defendants): Cottonham v. Redline Recovery Services, LLC; and Palisades Collection, LLCAlabama consumer sued the debt buyer Palisades Collection, LLC after it sued the consumer and lost at trial. The reason for the suit is that instead of Palisades removing the debt from the credit report (as the judge in the collection action said the consumer did not owe it) Palisades not only kept the debt on the credit report but updated it months and months after the trial to make it appear the consumer owed the debt. Then Palisades sent the account out to be collected by the co-defendant Redline Recovery Services, LLC who started collection activities against the consumer. Suit was brought under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and Alabama state law (defamation, invasion of privacy, wantonness, intentional conduct, and malice). Read more about this case (PDF). Go to Representative Consumer Protection Cases (Alphabetized by Defendants): |




