M

Go to Representative Consumer Protection Cases (Alphabetized by Defendants):
A - B - C - D - E - F & G - H - I, J,K,L - M - N & O - P & Q - R - S - T - U - V - W,X,Y,Z

Albrets v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.

Alabama consumer was told harassed over the phone by the well-known Midland Credit Management, Inc. Consumer was told getting an attorney would not help her and she should not hire a lawyer. Despite the illegal attempt to interfere with a consumer's right to hire a lawyer and the false advice that an attorney would only hurt the consumer and cost the consumer money, consumer hired an attorney and filed suit against Midland Credit Management, Inc. for violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and Alabama state law (invasion of privacy).

Bruno v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.; Equifax; Experian; and TransUnion

Alabama consumer sued the debt buyer Midland Credit Management after it sued the consumer and lost at the collection trial. Alabama consumer disputed the debt with all the credit reporting agencies and told them that consumer was sued, won, and therefore did not owe the junk debt buyer Midland Credit any money. Consumer provided the case number and the phone number to the court and to collection counsel for Midland. None of the three reporting bureaus called the court or collection counsel. Instead, as is typical, the consumer reporting agencies did a bogus investigation and instead of removing the debt from the credit report (as the judge in the collection action said the consumer did not owe it) all the defendants intentionally decided to keep the debt/account on consumer's credit report. Suit was brought under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), (Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), and Alabama state law (defamation, invasion of privacy, wantonness, intentional conduct, and malice).

Dial v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.; and Experian

Alabama consumer was sued by the debt buyer Midland Credit Management and after defeating Midland at trial, consumer disputed the debt with all the credit reporting agencies and told them that consumer was sued, won, and therefore did not owe the junk debt buyer Midland Credit any money. Instead of removing the debt from the credit report (as the judge in the collection action said the consumer did not owe it) Midland and Experian intentionally decided to keep the debt/account on consumer's credit report. Suit was brought against Midland under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), and against all defendants for violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), and Alabama state law (defamation, invasion of privacy, wantonness, intentional conduct, and malice).

Rupert vs Midland Credit Management, Inc, Experian Information Solutions, Inc

Go to Representative Consumer Protection Cases (Alphabetized by Defendants):
A - B - C - D - E - F & G - H - I, J,K,L - M - N & O - P & Q - R - S - T - U - V - W,X,Y,Z